How to Read Australian Property Market Forecasts Without Being Misled by Them
Property forecasts are published every year by major research houses, banks, and media outlets. Understanding what they are, what drives them, and how to read them critically is more useful than any single forecast figure.
Every year, major research organisations publish forecasts for Australian capital city property prices. Every year, those forecasts diverge significantly from each other, and often from what actually happens. And every year, people make significant financial decisions based on a single headline figure without understanding what that figure actually represents or how it was derived.
This article is not a forecast. It is a guide to reading forecasts. The 2024 cycle is used throughout as a case study because it illustrates, clearly and in hindsight, how forecasts are constructed, what they get right, and where their limitations tend to show up. The framework applies equally to any future cycle.
What property forecasts actually are
A property market forecast is an analytical opinion, not a statement of fact about the future. It is produced by modelling current conditions, applying assumptions about how key variables will change, and projecting what the combined effect of those changes might be on prices. Different organisations use different models, different assumptions, and different data inputs. This is why forecasts from major research houses for the same city in the same year frequently differ by several percentage points.
A forecast is only as reliable as its underlying assumptions. Understanding those assumptions matters more than the headline number.
Forecasts are published by a range of organisations including bank research teams, property data companies such as CoreLogic and PropTrack, academic institutions, and government bodies. The Reserve Bank of Australia publishes regular commentary on housing market conditions and risks in its Financial Stability Review. The ABS publishes authoritative property price index data at abs.gov.au. These are primary sources. Media summaries of forecasts are secondary sources and frequently strip out the caveats that make the original analysis useful.
A well-constructed forecast typically presents a range of scenarios rather than a single figure. When a forecast says “prices will rise 5%”, that is a point estimate. When it says “prices are expected to rise between 3% and 8% depending on interest rate outcomes”, that is a range, which is more honest about the level of uncertainty involved. Forecasts presented as single confident figures warrant more scepticism than those accompanied by scenario analysis.
The supply and demand indicators that drive forecasts
Property prices, like prices for most things, are fundamentally driven by the balance between supply and demand in a given market. Analysts build forecasts by attempting to model how each of the following indicators is likely to shift over the forecast period. Understanding these indicators is what allows a reader to evaluate whether a forecast’s assumptions are reasonable.
Supply-side indicators
The rate at which new dwellings are approved and completed affects how much new supply enters the market. Building approvals data is published monthly by the ABS and is one of the most watched leading indicators of future supply. Delays in construction, rising build costs, or developer pullback all reduce supply and can support prices.
The number of properties listed for sale or rent at any given time affects buyer and renter negotiating power. Low listings relative to demand typically support prices. High listings can create downward pressure. CoreLogic and SQM Research both publish regular data on listing volumes and vacancy rates across Australian markets.
Land release programs, planning approvals, first home buyer schemes, and build-to-rent incentives all affect the rate at which supply enters the market. Policy changes can shift supply dynamics quickly. Housing Australia publishes research on supply gaps and policy impacts at housingaustralia.gov.au.
When the cost of building a new dwelling rises significantly, it becomes harder for developers to deliver supply profitably and harder for buyers to compare new versus existing stock. The ABS publishes construction cost indices as part of its producer price index data. Elevated construction costs can create a practical floor beneath existing property prices in some markets.
Demand-side indicators
The Reserve Bank of Australia’s cash rate directly affects mortgage rates, which in turn affect how much buyers can borrow and therefore how much they can pay. Higher rates reduce borrowing capacity and typically dampen demand. The RBA publishes cash rate decisions and commentary at rba.gov.au. APRA’s serviceability buffer requirements add a further layer of assessment above the actual rate.
Net overseas migration and interstate population flows affect housing demand at a city and regional level. Strong population growth into a market where supply is constrained tends to support prices. The Centre for Population at Treasury publishes projections at population.gov.au. ABS publishes migration data regularly.
Strong job markets and wage growth support household capacity to service mortgages and maintain demand for housing. The ABS publishes labour force and wage price index data regularly. Markets with strong employment growth in industries that attract skilled workers tend to see more sustained housing demand.
Buyer confidence and lenders’ willingness to extend credit both affect demand independently of the fundamental indicators above. Westpac and the Melbourne Institute jointly publish a monthly consumer sentiment index. APRA’s lending data shows trends in credit growth and serviceability assessments across the banking system.
The 2024 cycle: what forecasters said and why
The 2024 Australian property forecast cycle is a useful case study because it illustrates several important features of how forecasts are constructed and where they diverge. The following is based on publicly available forecast reports published in late 2023 for the 2024 year. Readers wanting the original reports should access them directly from their sources, as figures are best understood in their full context.
Going into 2024, the dominant question in Australian property forecasting was how sustained the rate-hiking cycle would prove to be and whether buyer demand would hold up in the face of higher mortgage costs. Most major forecasters expected national price growth to continue but at a more moderate pace than the post-pandemic surge.
The divergence between cities was a central theme. Markets like Perth and Brisbane, which had stronger relative affordability and were benefiting from population inflows and resources sector activity, were forecast by several analysts to outperform Sydney and Melbourne, where affordability constraints and rate sensitivity were more pronounced. According to PropTrack’s 2023 Property Market Outlook report (available at realestate.com.au/insights), Brisbane and Perth were among the markets expected to see the strongest growth heading into 2024.
The supply constraint story was significant. Construction completions had been running below the rate needed to house population growth for several years. Domain’s end-of-year 2023 research (available at domain.com.au/research) identified the structural undersupply of housing as a key factor likely to support prices even in a higher-rate environment.
The key uncertainty was rates. Most forecasts were built around scenarios involving stable or modestly declining rates in 2024. Forecasts that assumed rates would fall quickly were more optimistic than those that modelled an extended period of higher rates. This is a good example of how the same underlying market data can produce materially different forecasts depending on a single assumption.
The lesson from this case study is not whether any specific forecast proved accurate. It is that the most informative part of any forecast is usually not the headline percentage figure, but the assumptions about rates, supply, and population that sit underneath it.
How to read any property forecast critically
The following questions are worth applying to any property forecast, regardless of who published it or what year it covers. They are based on how analysts and researchers describe good practice in evaluating forward-looking market analysis.
- Who published it and what are their incentives? A forecast published by a mortgage broker aggregator, a developer marketing platform, or a media outlet with property advertising revenue occupies a different position to one published by APRA, the RBA, or an independent research house. Understanding who benefits from a bullish or bearish forecast helps calibrate how to read it.
- Is it a point estimate or a range? A single figure like “prices will rise 6%” tells you very little about uncertainty. A range with named scenarios (“3% to 9% depending on rate outcomes”) is more honest and more useful. Forecasts without scenario analysis tend to overstate certainty.
- What are the key assumptions? Every forecast embeds assumptions about interest rates, population growth, supply levels, and economic conditions. A forecast that assumes rates will fall significantly in the next 12 months will look very different from one that assumes rates hold. If the assumptions are not stated, they are worth asking about or looking for in the full report.
- National versus local? A national average forecast conceals enormous variation between cities, between suburbs, and between property types. A forecast of 5% national growth is consistent with 15% growth in one market and flat or negative performance in another. The more granular and local the forecast, the more useful it typically is for an individual investment decision.
- What is the track record of this source? Forecast track records are rarely published prominently. A source that was significantly wrong about the previous year’s market, in either direction, without explaining why, provides less signal than one that explains its errors and adjusts its methodology accordingly.
- Can you access the primary source? Media summaries of forecasts frequently strip out the caveats, the scenarios, and the methodology. When a forecast matters to a decision, reading the original report rather than a summary is worth the time. Most major research houses publish their property outlooks publicly or via free registration.
What property investors can and cannot control
One of the most useful reframes in property research is distinguishing between what a forecast tells you and what you can actually act on. Forecasts describe market-level trends. Individual investment outcomes depend on factors that are at least partly within an investor’s control regardless of what the market does.
Cash rate decisions. National population flows. Construction cost inflation. Global economic conditions. Government policy changes. Macro sentiment shifts. The accuracy of any given forecast.
The specific location and property type selected. The price paid relative to comparable sales. The financing structure and buffer maintained. The quality of due diligence before purchase. The hold period and exit timing. Whether professional advice is sought before acting.
Research in property investment consistently suggests that the variables within an investor’s control, buying well relative to comparable properties, maintaining adequate liquidity buffers, selecting locations with strong underlying demand drivers, tend to have a larger effect on individual outcomes than whether the market-wide forecast proved accurate. A property purchased well in a market that underperforms the forecast can still deliver a sound outcome. A property purchased poorly in a booming market may not.
Authoritative sources for property market research
The following are primary and authoritative sources for Australian property market data, policy, and research. These are the sources that major forecasters draw on and the ones worth going to directly rather than relying on media summaries.
What people commonly do when researching a property market
For those working through a property research process, these are the steps most commonly described as forming a useful foundation before any investment decision is made.
-
1
Read the RBA’s Financial Stability Review Free today
The RBA’s Financial Stability Review is published twice yearly and contains the most authoritative publicly available analysis of risks and conditions in the Australian housing market. It is more useful than any media summary because it explains the reasoning, not just the conclusion. -
2
Check the ABS residential property price indexes Free today
The ABS residential property price indexes are updated quarterly and show actual price movements across all eight capital cities. Looking at historical data before reading a current forecast helps calibrate how accurate previous forecasts were for that market. -
3
Read forecast reports at the source, not via media summaries
When a major research house publishes a property outlook, the full report contains scenarios, assumptions, and caveats that media summaries typically remove. PropTrack publishes research at realestate.com.au/insights and Domain publishes research at domain.com.au/research. Both are freely accessible. -
4
Apply the six critical reading questions to any forecast
Before acting on any forecast, working through the checklist in this article (who published it, point estimate or range, what assumptions, national versus local, track record, primary source accessible) tends to quickly separate well-constructed analysis from headline-driven commentary. -
5
Engage a licensed financial adviser and registered tax agent before any purchase
How macro market conditions interact with a specific property, in a specific location, at a specific price point, within a specific ownership structure, depends on individual circumstances that general forecasts cannot account for. The ASIC Financial Advisers Register and the Tax Practitioners Board register both allow credential verification before engagement.
Understanding how to read property market forecasts is the kind of financial literacy that compounds over a lifetime of decisions. Most people never build it because they never have to until it matters. If you want to build these habits alongside others doing the same, MSH is a free community built around exactly that.
Join free here →